Another court victory in Harry’s campaign to hold the press to account, but what are the broader implications?

Harry pulled the plug on a high stakes lawsuit against a Rupert Murdoch-owned British tabloid after receiving an apology.

Prince Harry and his legal team have struck a last-minute settlement deal with a newspaper group for invasion of privacy — the same week the case was set to go trial.

Prince Harry has settled with Rupert Murdoch's NGN and received an apology over The Sun and News of the World claims.

LONDON — Prince Harry settled his lawsuit against Rupert Murdoch's British tabloids on Wednesday, accepting damages and an apology from News Group Newspapers over years of phone hacking and other unlawful intrusion . The company has also apologized to a second claimant, former Labour Party politician Tom Watson, now Lord Watson.

A legal battle brought by Prince Harry against the publisher of The Sun newspaper, owned by media mogul Rupert Murdoch, kicked off at the High Court in London on Tuesday, without Prince Harry in attendance and with several delays.

As a new court case begins, we look into the background of Prince Harry's unprecedented crusade against the British tabloid industry. View on euronews

Prince Harry won a major apology from Rupert Murdoch 's U.K. newspaper division, including for his mother—but the company stopped short of an apology for Meghan Markle.

An expert has revealed what they claim is the reason Prince Harry decided to settle his court case against News Group Newspapers (NGN) after previously saying he wouldn't. The Duke of Sussex settled his cause against Rupert Murdoch's NGN on Wednesday alongside fellow claimant and former deputy leader of the Labour Party,

Prince Harry's legal team has been told to curb legal costs in his next case against a British publisher, Associated Newspapers, the publisher of the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday

In a statement outside the London court, Harry's barrister David Sherborne said NGN had spent "more than a billion pounds in payouts and in legal costs" in order to "prevent the f